Ads 468x60px

Pages

Rabu, 31 Juli 2013

Better Processor AMD or Intel

IntelAMD
Core i7-2600, -2600K
Core i7-965, -975 Extreme, -980X Extreme, -990X Extreme
Core i7-970, -960
Core i5-2500, -2500K

Core i7-860, -870, -875K, -920, -930, -940, -950,
Core i5-750, -760
Core 2 Extreme QX9775, QX9770, QX9650
Core 2 Quad Q9650
Core i3-2100
Phenom II X4 Black Edition 975
Core 2 Extreme QX6850, QX6800
Core 2 Quad Q9550, Q9450, Q9400
Core i5-650, -655K, -660, -661, -670, -680
Phenom II X6 1100T BE, 1090T BE, 1075T
Phenom II X4 Black Edition 970, 965, 955 
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Quad Q6700, Q9300, Q8400, Q6600, Q8300
Core 2 Duo E8600, E8500, E8400, E7600
Core i3 -530, -540, -550
Phenom II X6 1055T
Phenom II X4 945, 940, 920, 910, 910e, 810
Phenom II X3 Black Edition 720, 740
Athlon II X4 645, 640, 635, 630
Athlon II X3 455, 450, 445, 440, 435
Core 2 Extreme X6800
Core 2 Quad Q8200
Core 2 Duo E8300, E8200, E8190, E7500, E7400, E6850, E6750
Phenom II X4 905e, 805
Phenom II X3 710, 705e
Phenom II X2 565 BE, 560 BE, 555 BE, 550 BE, 545
Phenom X4 9950
Athlon II X4 620
Athlon II X3 425
Core 2 Duo E7200, E6550, E7300, E6540, E6700
Pentium Dual-Core E5700, E5800, E6300, E6500, E6600, E6700
Pentium G9650
Phenom X4 9850, 9750, 9650, 9600
Phenom X3 8850, 8750
Athlon II X2 265, 260, 255
Athlon 64 X2 6400+
Core 2 Duo E4700, E4600, E6600, E4500, E6420
Pentium Dual-Core E5400, E5300, E5200 
Phenom X4 9500, 9550, 9450e, 9350e
Phenom X3 8650, 8600, 8550, 8450e, 8450, 8400, 8250e
Athlon II X2 240, 245, 250
Athlon X2 7850, 7750
Athlon 64 X2 6000+, 5600+
Core 2 Duo E4400, E4300, E6400, E6320
Celeron E3300
Phenom X4 9150e, 9100e
Athlon X2 7550, 7450, 5050e, 4850e/b
Athlon 64 X2 5400+, 5200+, 5000+, 4800+
Core 2 Duo E5500, E6300
Pentium Dual-Core E2220, E2200, E2210
Celeron E3200
Athlon X2 6550, 6500, 4450e/b,
Athlon X2 4600+, 4400+, 4200+, BE-2400
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
Celeron E1600
Athlon 64 X2 4000+, 3800+
Athlon X2 4050e, BE-2300
Pentium Dual-Core E2160, E2140
Celeron E1500, E1400, E1200


DIFFERENCES, ADVANTAGES AND LACK OF INTEL PROCESSOR AND PROCESSOR AMD
Some of the differences, advantages and disadvantages of Intel and AMD processors:
1. On the Intel instruction set was MMX, SSE, SSE2, and SSE3, but the AMD SSE2 and 3DNow. But of the many istruksi used by Intel actually has existed in its AMD 3DNow that is not owned by Intel.
2. Maximum of 32K L1 on Intel, AMD is currently at 128K. Based on some tests of AMD with 128K L1 is superior to Intel.
3. Many transistors on an Intel 100 billion is AMD 105 billion.
4. The number of decoders, Integer, FP on intel AMD less than the differences that significantly improve the performance of AMD.
5. Temperature on an Intel processor may be arranged by themselves (the processor will reduce the speed if the processor is too hot), on AMD64 maximum temperature is 900C. Intel technology is more superior than AMD.
6. AMD is superior in the processing of communications applications, such as data transfer on the modem, ADSL, MP3, and doubly Suround Digital Sound.
7. Pipeline on Intels longer than AMD, but Intels pipeline problems at the exchange task, so the speed is slow intel pipeline under AMD.
8. Intel wins on brand image and marketnya, while AMD is a cheaper price.
9. On an Intel Pentium 4 standard price, performance lumanyan fast. Sure, for the affairs of less than masshi graphics with AMD, but at least not fast Intel processor heat.
10. On the AMD Athlon processor prices somewhat cheaper than Intel. Really good graphics, decent speed, but cepet really hotter than Intel.
11. For the price and power (electricity) use AMDs much cheaper and far-saving advantages that electricity was not out a lot of capital and cash-flow for the monthly (pay for electricity) is slightly lighter.

Intel:
PLUS (+):
Variants have the fastest performance, even there has been no AMD processors can reply jd unmatchable range hrg pd> 2jt (ga emg exactly AMD have processors with hrg> 2jt).
Many say a very stable heavy use purposes and multi-tasking applications
Variants and the price range most widely
Clock ratio / performance best
Small power consumption with high performance

MINUS (-):
They are more expensive
The number of variants may only confuse
The highest variant (Extreme Edition) expensive knock on wood
The price of a platform (processor + mobo + RAM) is high.

AMD:
PLUS (+):
Cheap prices, with balanced performance
Variant is more directed toward economically with the price / performance ratio exceeding even the highest price / performance of Intel.
AMDs hot? says who? AMDs mah d dinosaur age still alive. Skrg, here uda much Reseller kl Quad-core AMD could even colder DRPD Intel Dual-core processors.
The highest variant (Black Edition) hrg with affordable priced, without losing face front d Intel processors at the same price.
Price platform (processor + mobo + RAM) cheaper without mengorbakan kseluruhan performance.

MINUS (-):
DRPD higher power consumption Intel processor with similar performance
RasioClock / low performance lbh DRPD Intel (eg AMD Phenom II X4 955BE 3.2 GHz Intel just can ngimbangin reply Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.8 GHz and 3.6 GHz Phenom II 810 could diimbangin sm stock 2.6 GHz Core i5 750)

My Personal Conclusion:
Intels more powerful processors than AMD porsesor on multimedia applications and Multi-tasking, whereas AMD wins from Intel processors in its gaming and 3D programs.
Ga no problem want to use AMD / INTEL Possible issue price considerations alone,,, AMD systems with capabilities equivalent to INTEL, INTEL cheaper than ... I underline, a system with equal ability you know ...
Now please take your own conclusions ... to select which .... its just as good ...
The key can be retrieved with the specifications of masing2 brand ... because its VITAL ...

Related Posts by Categories

0 komentar:

Posting Komentar