| Intel | AMD |
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600, -2600K Core i7-965, -975 Extreme, -980X Extreme, -990X Extreme Core i7-970, -960 Core i5-2500, -2500K | |
| Core i7-860, -870, -875K, -920, -930, -940, -950, Core i5-750, -760 Core 2 Extreme QX9775, QX9770, QX9650 Core 2 Quad Q9650 Core i3-2100 | Phenom II X4 Black Edition 975 |
| Core 2 Extreme QX6850, QX6800 Core 2 Quad Q9550, Q9450, Q9400 Core i5-650, -655K, -660, -661, -670, -680 | Phenom II X6 1100T BE, 1090T BE, 1075T Phenom II X4 Black Edition 970, 965, 955 |
| Core 2 Extreme QX6700 Core 2 Quad Q6700, Q9300, Q8400, Q6600, Q8300 Core 2 Duo E8600, E8500, E8400, E7600 Core i3 -530, -540, -550 | Phenom II X6 1055T Phenom II X4 945, 940, 920, 910, 910e, 810 Phenom II X3 Black Edition 720, 740 Athlon II X4 645, 640, 635, 630 Athlon II X3 455, 450, 445, 440, 435 |
| Core 2 Extreme X6800 Core 2 Quad Q8200 Core 2 Duo E8300, E8200, E8190, E7500, E7400, E6850, E6750 | Phenom II X4 905e, 805 Phenom II X3 710, 705e Phenom II X2 565 BE, 560 BE, 555 BE, 550 BE, 545 Phenom X4 9950 Athlon II X4 620 Athlon II X3 425 |
| Core 2 Duo E7200, E6550, E7300, E6540, E6700 Pentium Dual-Core E5700, E5800, E6300, E6500, E6600, E6700 Pentium G9650 | Phenom X4 9850, 9750, 9650, 9600 Phenom X3 8850, 8750 Athlon II X2 265, 260, 255 Athlon 64 X2 6400+ |
| Core 2 Duo E4700, E4600, E6600, E4500, E6420 Pentium Dual-Core E5400, E5300, E5200 | Phenom X4 9500, 9550, 9450e, 9350e Phenom X3 8650, 8600, 8550, 8450e, 8450, 8400, 8250e Athlon II X2 240, 245, 250 Athlon X2 7850, 7750 Athlon 64 X2 6000+, 5600+ |
| Core 2 Duo E4400, E4300, E6400, E6320 Celeron E3300 | Phenom X4 9150e, 9100e Athlon X2 7550, 7450, 5050e, 4850e/b Athlon 64 X2 5400+, 5200+, 5000+, 4800+ |
| Core 2 Duo E5500, E6300 Pentium Dual-Core E2220, E2200, E2210 Celeron E3200 | Athlon X2 6550, 6500, 4450e/b, Athlon X2 4600+, 4400+, 4200+, BE-2400 |
| Pentium Dual-Core E2180 Celeron E1600 | Athlon 64 X2 4000+, 3800+ Athlon X2 4050e, BE-2300 |
| Pentium Dual-Core E2160, E2140 Celeron E1500, E1400, E1200 |
DIFFERENCES, ADVANTAGES AND LACK OF INTEL PROCESSOR AND PROCESSOR AMD
Some of the differences, advantages and disadvantages of Intel and AMD processors:
1. On the Intel instruction set was MMX, SSE, SSE2, and SSE3, but the AMD SSE2 and 3DNow. But of the many istruksi used by Intel actually has existed in its AMD 3DNow that is not owned by Intel.
2. Maximum of 32K L1 on Intel, AMD is currently at 128K. Based on some tests of AMD with 128K L1 is superior to Intel.
3. Many transistors on an Intel 100 billion is AMD 105 billion.
4. The number of decoders, Integer, FP on intel AMD less than the differences that significantly improve the performance of AMD.
5. Temperature on an Intel processor may be arranged by themselves (the processor will reduce the speed if the processor is too hot), on AMD64 maximum temperature is 900C. Intel technology is more superior than AMD.
6. AMD is superior in the processing of communications applications, such as data transfer on the modem, ADSL, MP3, and doubly Suround Digital Sound.
7. Pipeline on Intels longer than AMD, but Intels pipeline problems at the exchange task, so the speed is slow intel pipeline under AMD.
8. Intel wins on brand image and marketnya, while AMD is a cheaper price.
9. On an Intel Pentium 4 standard price, performance lumanyan fast. Sure, for the affairs of less than masshi graphics with AMD, but at least not fast Intel processor heat.
10. On the AMD Athlon processor prices somewhat cheaper than Intel. Really good graphics, decent speed, but cepet really hotter than Intel.
11. For the price and power (electricity) use AMDs much cheaper and far-saving advantages that electricity was not out a lot of capital and cash-flow for the monthly (pay for electricity) is slightly lighter.
Intel:
PLUS (+):
Variants have the fastest performance, even there has been no AMD processors can reply jd unmatchable range hrg pd> 2jt (ga emg exactly AMD have processors with hrg> 2jt).
Many say a very stable heavy use purposes and multi-tasking applications
Variants and the price range most widely
Clock ratio / performance best
Small power consumption with high performance
MINUS (-):
They are more expensive
The number of variants may only confuse
The highest variant (Extreme Edition) expensive knock on wood
The price of a platform (processor + mobo + RAM) is high.
AMD:
PLUS (+):
Cheap prices, with balanced performance
Variant is more directed toward economically with the price / performance ratio exceeding even the highest price / performance of Intel.
AMDs hot? says who? AMDs mah d dinosaur age still alive. Skrg, here uda much Reseller kl Quad-core AMD could even colder DRPD Intel Dual-core processors.
The highest variant (Black Edition) hrg with affordable priced, without losing face front d Intel processors at the same price.
Price platform (processor + mobo + RAM) cheaper without mengorbakan kseluruhan performance.
MINUS (-):
DRPD higher power consumption Intel processor with similar performance
RasioClock / low performance lbh DRPD Intel (eg AMD Phenom II X4 955BE 3.2 GHz Intel just can ngimbangin reply Core 2 Quad Q9550 2.8 GHz and 3.6 GHz Phenom II 810 could diimbangin sm stock 2.6 GHz Core i5 750)
My Personal Conclusion:
Intels more powerful processors than AMD porsesor on multimedia applications and Multi-tasking, whereas AMD wins from Intel processors in its gaming and 3D programs.
Ga no problem want to use AMD / INTEL Possible issue price considerations alone,,, AMD systems with capabilities equivalent to INTEL, INTEL cheaper than ... I underline, a system with equal ability you know ...
Now please take your own conclusions ... to select which .... its just as good ...
The key can be retrieved with the specifications of masing2 brand ... because its VITAL ...
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar